The Prime Minister, responding to Sir Keir Starmer’s promise to be on the side of the builders not blockers, says the Tories will not build houses on green spaces. His colleague Michael Gove, Levelling Up Secretary says he is not opposed to all building on green belt land, if the new places are beautiful. This … Continue reading Tory housing policy split
Tackling vested interests
Sir Keir Starmer, in his interview with the Times Political Editor Steven Swinford, vowed to be tough enough to take on vested interests, accusing developers and landowners of building too little housing in order to drive up prices. This is a hostile, poorly informed accusation which will antagonise an important and powerful section of the … Continue reading Tackling vested interests
Labour & Housing supply
Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer is paying attention to the housing deficit and its consequences, and this is welcome news. Whilst it is a start, for Labour to becomes the catalyst of housing change they too, like the Conservatives have fierce ideologies defects to remedy. To progress, as Starmer intends, these must be faced and … Continue reading Labour & Housing supply
Sensible planning & politics + objective
This log is long. I apologise. These two, planning and politics, are in conflict. Not one of the main political parties acknowledges this fact. For example, economically the nation needs policies to accelerate growth and improve productivity. Short term policy fixes, a confrontational mind-set in Westminster, policy U-turns at elections and slavish party loyalty, at … Continue reading Sensible planning & politics + objective
Modular housing supply
Some useful insights in the last few days into Labour and Conservative housing policies in the run-up to yesterday’s local elections. These need thought. Until the voting results are clearer, (I write today early on Friday) responding is premature. Moving on, for sometime I have wondered about logic of the push, with both political and … Continue reading Modular housing supply
Local Support? That means ‘You pay me’.
How can I put this? Your idea of local democracy? Q. You don’t want houses near you? A. No. They need to go somewhere more appropriate, more sustainable. Q. Fine. I agree. Snag is the residents in the host location you suggest reckon their house prices will fall 10%. They want you to pay them … Continue reading Local Support? That means ‘You pay me’.
Reality arrives
Berkshire will be the first real-time example of housing policy failure. Put plainly, what happens when long term spatial thinking, to identify actual locations for new homes can no longer be ignored by local leaders? Here is the answer. Stantec, planning consultants appointed to advise Slough, South Buckinghamshire and the Windsor and Maidenhead councils where … Continue reading Reality arrives
Pious PM Fails
Is this leadership? PM Sunak dumped the housing targets due to pressure from Tory members, back benchers and councillors. A consistent story of , un Conservative nationally imposed targets he said, in his ConservativeHome interview yesterday. But ‘Let’s talk about home ownership’ he says. It is all about striking the right balance he adds. It … Continue reading Pious PM Fails
New homes with Local Support
Introduction In England we have a housing problem. Prices and rents are too high for young people. Halving them and mortgage debt over a generation (by 2050/2060) will boost their future prosperity. But worry today’s generation of home owners. Will their equity, for example dry up if supply matches demand? Conflicting priorities blocks progress. Locally … Continue reading New homes with Local Support
Stop press
My last post was 8 March, in which I said I will post my solution soon. This is taking time. Please be patient. So here is a version of the key concern, being a recent comment by me attached to an FT article. It captures the political dilemma. You must stop believing what the political … Continue reading Stop press